The disappearance of moral knowledge / Dallas Willard, Steven L. Porter, Aaron Preston and Gregg A. Ten Elshof.

Yazar:Willard, Dallas, 1935-2013
Katkıda bulunan(lar):Porter, Steven L, 1970- [editor.] | Preston, Aaron [editor.] | Ten Elshof, Gregg, 1970- [editor.] | Taylor and Francis
Materyal türü: KonuKonuYayıncı: Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis, [2018]Telif hakkı tarihi: ©2019Baskı: First editionTanım: 1 online resource (420 pages)İçerik türü:text Ortam türü:computer Taşıyıcı türü: online resourceISBN: 9780429958885 (e-book: PDF)Konu(lar): RELIGION / Christian Theology / Ethics | Aaron Preston | Alasdair Macintyre | Analytic Ethics | Dallas Willard | Ethics | Gregg Tenelshof | GE Moore | Goodness | History Of Ethics | John Dewey | John Rawls | Moral Facts | Moral Good And Evil | Moral Knowledge | Multifunctionalism | Nihilism | Steve Porter | Science Of Ethics | Social Constructivism | Social Knowledge | Social Morality | TH Green | Veil Of Ignorance | 19Th-Century Philosophy | 20Th-Century Philosophy | Civilization, Western -- 20th century | Civilization, Western | Ethics, Modern -- 20th century | Ethics, Modern | PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy | PHILOSOPHY / SocialEk fiziksel biçimler:Print version: : Başlık yokDDC sınıflandırma: 170.9/04 LOC classification: BJ319Çevrimiçi kaynaklar: Click here to view.
İçindekiler:
chapter 1 Moral Knowledge Disappears -- chapter 2 A “Science of Ethics”? -- chapter 3 G. E. Moore: From Science of Ethics to Nihilism -- chapter 4 Emotivism: The Erasure of Moral Knowledge -- chapter 5 A Rational Form of Noncognitivism? “Rational Necessity” Relocated -- chapter 6 A Consensus of Rational People: Social Constructionism in Rawls -- chapter 7 Practices, Traditions and Narratives: Social Constructionism in MacIntyre -- chapter 8 Prospects for a Return of Moral Knowledge.
Öz: Based on an unfinished manuscript by the late philosopher Dallas Willard, this book makes the case that the 20th century saw a massive shift in Western beliefs and attitudes concerning the possibility of moral knowledge, such that knowledge of the moral life and of its conduct is no longer routinely available from the social institutions long thought to be responsible for it. In this sense, moral knowledge—as a publicly available resource for living—has disappeared. Via a detailed survey of main developments in ethical theory from the late 19th through the late 20th centuries, Willard explains philosophy’s role in this shift. In pointing out the shortcomings of these developments, he shows that the shift was not the result of rational argument or discovery, but largely of arational social forces—in other words, there was no good reason for moral knowledge to have disappeared.
Bu kütüphanenin etiketleri: Kütüphanedeki eser adı için etiket yok. Etiket eklemek için oturumu açın.
    Ortalama derecelendirme: 0.0 (0 oy)
Bu kayda ilişkin materyal yok

chapter 1 Moral Knowledge Disappears -- chapter 2 A “Science of Ethics”? -- chapter 3 G. E. Moore: From Science of Ethics to Nihilism -- chapter 4 Emotivism: The Erasure of Moral Knowledge -- chapter 5 A Rational Form of Noncognitivism? “Rational Necessity” Relocated -- chapter 6 A Consensus of Rational People: Social Constructionism in Rawls -- chapter 7 Practices, Traditions and Narratives: Social Constructionism in MacIntyre -- chapter 8 Prospects for a Return of Moral Knowledge.

Based on an unfinished manuscript by the late philosopher Dallas Willard, this book makes the case that the 20th century saw a massive shift in Western beliefs and attitudes concerning the possibility of moral knowledge, such that knowledge of the moral life and of its conduct is no longer routinely available from the social institutions long thought to be responsible for it. In this sense, moral knowledge—as a publicly available resource for living—has disappeared. Via a detailed survey of main developments in ethical theory from the late 19th through the late 20th centuries, Willard explains philosophy’s role in this shift. In pointing out the shortcomings of these developments, he shows that the shift was not the result of rational argument or discovery, but largely of arational social forces—in other words, there was no good reason for moral knowledge to have disappeared.

There are no comments on this title.

yorum yazmak için.

Ziyaretçi Sayısı

Destekleyen Koha