000 | 08264nam a22004573i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | EBC6422533 | ||
003 | MiAaPQ | ||
005 | 20220623112330.0 | ||
006 | m o d | | ||
007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
008 | 220617s2017 xx o ||||0 eng d | ||
020 |
_a9783319459776 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
020 | _z9783319459752 | ||
035 | _a(MiAaPQ)EBC6422533 | ||
035 | _a(Au-PeEL)EBL6422533 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)1021272378 | ||
040 |
_aMiAaPQ _beng _erda _epn _cMiAaPQ _dMiAaPQ |
||
050 | 4 | _aP99-99.4 | |
082 | 0 | _a401.9 | |
100 | 1 | _aHampton, James A. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | _aCompositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology. |
264 | 1 |
_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing AG, _c2017. |
|
264 | 4 | _c�2017. | |
300 | _a1 online resource (342 pages) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 |
_aLanguage, Cognition, and Mind Ser. ; _vv.3 |
|
505 | 0 | _aIntro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Contributors -- 1 Introduction -- Abstract -- References -- 2 Cognitively Plausible Theories of Concept Composition -- Abstract -- 1 Background Framework -- 1.1 Content Variability -- 2 Multiple Representational Forms -- 3 Pragmatic Constraint -- 4 Conclusion -- References -- Compositionality and Concepts---A Perspective from Formal Semantics and Philosophy of Language -- 1 (Some) Deep Background -- 2 (Some) Features of Compositionality -- 3 (Some) Philosophers of Language -- 4 (Some) Cognitive Psychologists -- 5 (Some) Linguistic Theories -- 5.1 (Some) Externalists -- 5.2 (Some) Emergentists -- 5.3 (Some) Essentialists -- 6 (Some) Objectivists Versus (Some) Subjectivists -- 6.1 Concepts and Privacy -- 6.2 Concepts and Meaning -- 6.3 Specificity and Meaning in Particular Instances of Language Use -- 6.4 Compositionality Cuts both Ways -- 7 (Some) Desiderata for a Two-Tiered Semantic Theory -- 7.1 Objectivist Two-Tiered Theories -- 7.2 Subjectivist Two-Tiered Theories -- 7.3 Two-Tiered Theories with a Nexus -- 8 (Some) Aspects of Current Theories of Mental Concepts that Require Attention -- 8.1 (Some) Messy Details for Conceptual Theories -- 8.2 Concepts, Sentences, and Bradley's Regress -- 8.3 REAL Negation, Conjunction, Conditional, and Disjunction -- 9 (Some) Concluding Remarks -- References -- 4 Compositionality and Concepts -- Abstract -- 1 Concepts and Prototypes -- 1.1 Combining Prototypes -- 1.2 Intensional Composition -- 1.3 Prototypes as Intensions -- 1.4 Context Sensitivity -- 1.5 Typicality and Gradedness -- 1.6 Does Variation in Typicality Really Undermine the Classical Model? -- 1.7 Ingredients of Typicality 1: Ideals -- 1.8 Ingredients of Typicality 2: Frequency and Familiarity -- 1.9 Typicality and Membership -- 1.10 Differentiating Vagueness from Ignorance. | |
505 | 8 | _a1.11 Concept Intensions as Fundamental -- 1.12 Impossible Objects and Hierarchical Levels -- 1.13 Results -- 2 Conclusions -- References -- 5 Typicality Knowledge and the Interpretation of Adjectives -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Overextension and World Knowledge -- 1.2 Further Effects of World Knowledge Involving Color Terms -- 2 Experiments -- 2.1 Pretest: Category Confirmation and Color Shift Judgments Along a Spectrum -- 3 Experiment 1: Forced Choice Between a Focal Color Versus a Nonfocal, Typical Color -- 4 Method -- 4.1 Results -- 5 Experiment 2: Yes-No Categorization Judgment -- 5.1 Method -- 5.2 Results -- 5.3 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- References -- 6 Concept Typicality and the Interpretation of Plural Predicate Conjunction -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Context and Logical Meaning -- 3 Typicality: Defining Context -- 4 Experimental Investigation -- 4.1 Pretests: Constructing Materials -- 4.2 Experiment 1: Interpretation of Plural Predicate Conjunction Sentences -- 4.3 Experiment 2: Compatibility of Predicate Pairs -- 4.4 Correlation Between Interpretation and Compatibility -- 5 Discussion -- 5.1 Reference Shift of the Plural Subject? -- 5.2 Other Measures of Typicality -- 5.3 Further Areas -- 6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- Appendix -- References -- Critical Typicality: Truth Judgements and Compositionality with Plurals and Other Gradable Concepts -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Vagueness and Acceptability Functions -- 3 Distributivity and Reciprocity as Gradable Concepts -- 4 Acceptability Versus Typicality -- 5 Guppy effects with gradable adjectives -- 6 Guppy Effects with Plurals -- 7 The Effect of Critical Typicality on Acceptability -- 8 Conclusion -- References -- 8 Complement Coercion as the Processing of Aspectual Verbs: Evidence from Self-paced Reading and fMRI -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction. | |
505 | 8 | _a1.1 The Complement Coercion Phenomenon -- 1.2 Challenges to the Type-Shifting Hypothesis -- 1.3 The Structured Individual (SI) Analysis -- 2 Pretest: Norming Questionnaire -- 2.1 Method -- 2.1.1 Participants -- 2.1.2 Materials -- 2.1.3 Procedures -- 2.2 Results -- 3 Experiment 1: Self-paced Reading -- 3.1 Method -- 3.1.1 Participants -- 3.1.2 Materials -- 3.1.3 Procedure -- 3.1.4 Data Analysis -- 3.2 Results -- 4 Experiment 2: fMRI -- 4.1 Method -- 4.1.1 Participants -- 4.1.2 Materials -- 4.1.3 Experimental Design -- 4.1.4 Imaging Acquisition -- 4.1.5 fMRI Data Analysis -- 4.2 Results -- 4.2.1 Behavioral Results -- 4.2.2 Imaging Results -- 5 Discussion -- 6 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- References -- 9 Conceptual Combination, Property Inclusion, and the Aristotelian-Thomistic View of Concepts -- Abstract -- 1 Overview -- 2 Background -- 3 Current Experiment -- 3.1 Method -- 3.2 Results -- 4 Discussion -- 4.1 The Aristotelian-Thomistic Approach -- 4.2 Applying the A-T View to the Modification Effect -- 5 Conclusion -- Conceptual Versus Referential Affordance in Concept Composition -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Two Approaches to Analyzing Modification -- 3 A Dual System for Semantic Composition -- 3.1 Conceptually Versus Referentially Afforded Composition -- 3.2 Empirical Evidence Supporting the Distinction -- 4 Conceptually Afforded Composition with Distributional Semantics -- 5 A Mixed Model for Two Types of Semantic Composition -- 6 Conclusions -- References -- 11 How Does the Left Anterior Temporal Lobe Contribute to Conceptual Combination? Interdisciplinary Perspectives -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 The LATL as a Central Combinatory Region -- 3 Theories of Conceptual Combination -- 3.1 Schema-Based Models -- 3.2 Relation-Based Models -- 3.3 Summary -- 4 Processing Predictions of Schema and Relation-Based Models -- 4.1 Storage and Retrieval. | |
505 | 8 | _a4.2 Composition -- 4.2.1 What Is the Combinatory Process? -- 4.2.2 Timing of Composition -- 5 Conclusions and Future Directions -- Acknowledgements -- References -- 12 Dimension Accessibility as a Predictor of Morphological Gradability -- Abstract -- 1 Adjectives Versus Nouns in Comparison Constructions -- 1.1 The Challenges -- 1.2 Psychological Theories of Similarity-Based Categorization -- 1.3 Logical Operations of Quantification Over Dimensions in Adjective Categorization -- 2 A Pilot Study of Acceptability Judgments -- 2.1 Method -- 2.2 Results -- 3 Discussion -- Acknowledgements -- Appendix A: Averages on 25 Participants for the Comparison Conditions with Nouns (Left) and Adjectives (Right) -- Appendix B: Averages on 25 Participants for the 24 Nouns in Baseline and Modified Conditions -- Appendix C: The Full Set of Sentences Together with Their Naturalness Mean and Sd -- References -- Author Index -- Subject Index. | |
588 | _aDescription based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. | ||
590 | _aElectronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2022. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. | ||
655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
700 | 1 | _aWinter, Yoad. | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _aHampton, James A. _tCompositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology _dCham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2017 _z9783319459752 |
797 | 2 | _aProQuest (Firm) | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ostimteknik/detail.action?docID=6422533 _zClick to View |
999 |
_c15657 _d15657 |